Comparison
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @mawtincrypto_vip | @shervin_trading |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 5.4M | 2.2M |
| Avg views | 12,642 | 172,609 |
| Engagement rate | 0.2% | 7.9% |
| 30-day growth | +87.1% | +133.4% |
| Language | فارسی | فارسی |
| Category | crypto | — |
| Channel age | 3642 days | 3410 days |
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@mawtincrypto_vip
Mixed signals
@shervin_trading
Looks reliable
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.